ERICKSON v. KERR

No. 29695-7-I.

69 Wn. App. 891 (1993)

851 P.2d 703

ANDREW ERICKSON, Individually and as Personal Representative, ET AL, Appellants, v. ROBERT F. KERR, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

As amended by order September 9, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Severson, Charles F. Vulliet, and Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Gray, for appellants.

Craig L. McIvor, Patricia N. Welch, and Lane Powell Spears Lubersky, for respondents.


[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals September 9, 1993.]

SCHOLFIELD, J.

Andrew Erickson, for himself and as personal representative of the estate of his wife Phillipa Erickson, and his son Craig Erickson seek a new trial based on certain evidentiary rulings in a medical malpractice trial against Mrs. Erickson's doctor, Dr. Robert Kerr. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Dr. Kerr first treated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases