1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 9 F.3d
  5. 9 F.3d 948 (1993)
 

HOGANAS AB v. DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 92-1526.

9 F.3d 948 (1993)

HOGANAS AB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing Declined January 7, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Linn, Marks & Murase, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel was Peter A. Dankin.

Roy W. Hardin, Richards, Medlock & Andrews, Dallas, TX, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was V. Bryan Medlock, Jr. Thomas R. Felger, Baker & Botts, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, represented defendant-appellee.

Before PLAGER, Circuit Judge, SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined January 7, 1994.

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

This is a patent infringement case which comes to us by way of appellant Hoganas AB's (Hoganas) appeal of the decision of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Civil Action No. 89-304, granting appellee Dresser Industries, Inc.'s (Dresser) motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 3,982,953 (the '953 patent), both...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases