Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find no merit to the defendant's contention that he was denied a fair trial because the court precluded his expert witness, a psychiatrist, from testifying about the complainant's mental condition. The psychiatrist never examined the complainant, and the hospital records which he would have based his opinion on only concerned the complainant's mental condition three days after the incident. Thus, it would have been speculative...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
