Defendant's contention that the court's charge diminished the People's burden of proof by including an expanded identification charge only as to the assault and reckless endangerment counts and not as to the robbery counts, and by instructing the jurors that their job was to determine "the truth", is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law, defendant having voiced no objections to the charge at trial (CPL 470.05). In any event, were we to review the argument in...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
