WEINSTOCK v. CLEARY, GOTTLIEB, STEEN & HAMILTON

No. 92 Civ. 7557 (LAP).

815 F.Supp. 127 (1993)

Israel WEINSTOCK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CLEARY, GOTTLIEB, STEEN & HAMILTON, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

Order Denying Reargument May 4, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weinstock, Joseph & Farley, P.C. by Israel Weinstock, Peter A. Joseph, Joel Farley, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz by Warren R. Stern, New York City, for Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton.


OPINION AND ORDER

PRESKA, District Judge.

Defendant Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton ("Cleary") moves to dismiss the amended complaint on three grounds: (1) the order of another court bars plaintiffs from proceeding on their claims in this action; (2) for reasons of judicial administration, this Court should decline to exercise its jurisdiction in deference to concurrent state proceedings; and (3) plaintiffs fail to state a federal claim, and the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases