1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 189 A.D.2d
  5. 189 A.D.2d 749 (1993)
 

LASEK v. NACHTIGALL

189 A.D.2d 749 (1993)

Theodore Lasek, Appellant, v. Richard Nachtigall, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

January 11, 1993

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff failed to show good cause why he did not disclose the fact that he retained an expert witness two weeks prior to trial until after opening statements had been made and the first witness had been called to testify. Under such circumstances, the trial court properly precluded the plaintiff's expert from testifying at trial (see, Corning v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases