Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
It is well established that where conflicting expert testimony is presented, the question of the defendant's sanity rests with the trier of fact, which may accept or reject the opinion of the expert witness and, in the absence of a serious flaw in the testimony of the People's expert, the fact finding of sanity
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.