1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 2 F.3d
  5. 2 F.3d 90 (1993)
 

HARTNETT v. SCHERING CORP.

No. 92-2422.

2 F.3d 90 (1993)

Mary D. HARTNETT; Joseph P. Hartnett, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SCHERING CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided August 26, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter M. Hartnett, Hartnett Law Office, Syracuse, NY, argued, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Linda Trummer-Napolitano, Law Offices of Henry R. Simon, White Plains, NY, argued (Henry R. Simon, on brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge, and G. Ross ANDERSON, Jr., United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation.

OPINION

GEORGE ROSS ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge:

Mary and Joseph Hartnett appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in their product liability action against Schering Corporation, a manufacturer of the drug Dienestrol (DEN). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Schering, having found as a matter of law that the Hartnetts failed to bring their action within the three year period mandated by the Maryland statute of limitations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases