1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 261 N.J.
  5. 261 N.J. Super. 659 (1993)
 

PIZZO MANTIN GROUP v. RANDOLPH TP.

261 N.J. Super. 659 (1993)

619 A.2d 676

PIZZO MANTIN GROUP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 4, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas R. Henshaw argued the cause for appellant (Henshaw & Brady, attorneys; Mr. Henshaw of counsel and on the brief with Rosella E. Nichay).

Edward J. Buzak argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Buzak of counsel and on the brief with Robert B. Campbell).

Hutt & Berkow, attorneys for amicus curiae, New Jersey Builders Association (Stewart M. Hutt, of counsel; Susan R. Kaplan on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN, HAVEY and BROCHIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by HAVEY, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Pizzo Mantin Group appeals from a judgment upholding the denial by defendant Planning Board of the Township of Randolph (Board) of plaintiff's preliminary major subdivision application. Relying on El Shaer v. Planning Bd., 249 N.J.Super. 323, 592 A.2d 565 (App.Div.), ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases