Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The People presented rebuttal testimony that identified the defendant from the photograph and videotape entered into evidence by the defendant. Though this rebuttal testimony was not technically rebuttal as it did not go to disprove the affirmative fact offered by the defendant that he had a different haircut at the time of the commission of the crime than he did at trial (see, People v Harris,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.