1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 82 N.Y.2d
  5. 82 N.Y.2d 832 (1993)
 

MATTER OF RUDEY v. LANDMARKS PRES. COMM'N OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK

82 N.Y.2d 832 (1993)

627 N.E.2d 508

606 N.Y.S.2d 588

In the Matter of John M. Rudey et al., Respondents, v. Landmarks Preservation Commission of the City of New York et al., Appellants, and 1030 Fifth Avenue Corporation, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided November 22, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

O. Peter Sherwood, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Fay Leoussis and Leonard Koerner of counsel), for appellants.

Tenzer, Greenblatt, Fallon & Kaplan, New York City (James G. Greilsheimer of counsel), and Berle, Kass & Case, New York City (Robert S. Davis of counsel), for John M. Rudey and another, respondents.

Richard I. Wolff, New York City, for 1030 Fifth Avenue Corporation, respondent.

Douglas N. Cogen, New York City, for Municipal Art Society of New York, Inc., amicus curiae.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA and LEVINE. Taking no part: Judge SMITH.

Order affirmed, with costs. It was arbitrary and capricious in the circumstances presented for the Landmarks Preservation Commission to differentiate between two residents in the same building in setting the timetable for replacement of nonconforming windows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases