HAUGH v. SMELICK

No. 18812.

887 P.2d 26 (1993)

126 Idaho 481

Chris HAUGH, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert SMELICK, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, October 1992 Term.

January 28, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Holland & Hart, Boise, for defendant-appellant. B. Newal Squyres, argued.

Roark, Donovan, Praggastis, Rivers & Phillips, Hailey, for plaintiff-respondent. Ray Keith Roark, argued.


ON REHEARING

1992 OPINION NO. 66, FILED APRIL 8, 1992, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN AND THIS OPINION IS SUBSTITUTED THEREFOR.

McDEVITT, Justice.

NATURE OF THE CASE

This appeal concerns development and construction of a planned unit development ("PUD"). Respondent, Chris Haugh ("Haugh"), instituted this action against appellant, Robert Smelick ("Smelick"), seeking to enjoin Smelick from constructing four (4) residential units in an area alleged to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases