Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff contends that he is entitled to a new trial because the court failed to include a portion of its original charge when it responded to the jury's request for reinstruction on the "green light ruling". We find that the omission in the supplemental instructions did not constitute reversible error as the original charge advised the jury of the proper principles (see, e.g., Goldberg v Wirtosko<...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
