1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 177 Wis.2d
  5. 177 Wis.2d 736 (1993)
 

JOHNSON v. LIRC

No. 92-2830.

177 Wis.2d 736 (1993)

503 N.W.2d 1

Minnie JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LABOR & INDUSTRY REVIEW COMMISSION, In-Sink-Erator Division of Emerson Electric Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided June 16, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of John S. Jude of Albert, Jude, Shuman, & Simanek, S.C. of Racine.

On behalf of the defendant-respondents, the cause was submitted on the briefs of James E. Doyle, attorney general, Stephen M. Sobota, assistant attorney general and Michael C. Frohman and Patti J. Kurth of Kasdorf, Lewis & Swietlik, S.C. of Milwaukee.

Before Nettesheim, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ.

ANDERSON, J.

Minnie Johnson appeals from a judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) which held that Johnson is not entitled to benefits under sec. 102.61, Stats. Johnson argues that a home-based enterprise program is compensable under sec. 102.61. We agree that persons participating in home-based enterprise programs may qualify for sec. 102.61 benefits, but hold that Johnson does not qualify. The reason...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases