MOSLEY v. POLLOCK


427 Pa.Super. 483 (1993)

629 A.2d 971

Kelce MOSLEY, Lloyd Rohanna, James Rizor, Robert Elliott and Stephen Love, Appellees, v. David F. POLLOCK, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed August 6, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David F. Pollock, in pro per.

William R. Nalitz, Waynesburg, for appellees.

Before WIEAND, POPOVICH and HESTER, JJ.


WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether a District Attorney is entitled to be reimbursed under 42 Pa.C.S. § 8547 for counsel fees incurred in defending an action by county officials to remove him from an ongoing criminal investigation into county investment practices. The trial court held that the statute did not contemplate such reimbursement and dismissed a petition therefor. After careful review, we affirm.

David F. Pollock, Esquire, is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases