1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 627 N.E.2d
  5. 627 N.E.2d 276 (1993)
 

CINCH MFG. CO. v. ROSEWELL

No. 1-91-2953.

627 N.E.2d 276 (1993)

255 Ill. App.3d 37

194 Ill.Dec. 160

CINCH MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner v. Edward J. ROSEWELL, County Treasurer and Ex-Officio County Collector of Cook County, Illinois, Respondent-Appellee (Commonwealth Edison Company, Petitioner-Appellant).

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division.

September 30, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keck, Mahin & Cate, Chicago (Thomas J. McNulty & Maria E. Stangel, of counsel), for petitioner-appellee.

Jack O'Malley, State's Atty., Chicago (Karen A. Covy, Daniel E. Cannon & Marie E. Smuda, of counsel), for respondent-appellee Rosewell.

Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, Chicago (Edward J. Santiago & Patricia J. Whitten, of counsel), for respondent-appellee Bd. of Ed.

Justice HOFFMAN delivered the opinion of the court:

The petitioner, Commonwealth Edison Company (Edison), appeals from the denial of its motion to amend its tax objection pleading. The trial court denied the motion to amend for lack of jurisdiction because it was filed more than 30 days after the entry of a pronouncement order which the court found was final. We consider whether this court has jurisdiction over Edison's appeal

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases