Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his right to a fair trial was violated by the prosecutor's remarks during opening and closing statements, coupled with the testimony of a police officer, implying the defendant's guilt of an unrelated burglary just prior to his arrest leading to this indictment. We find that the prosecutor's remarks, coupled with certain testimony of the police officer constituted error, since neither the remarks ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
