Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The record fails to support a finding that unless the order of seizure were granted without notice, there would be a probability that the chattel would become unavailable for seizure by reason of being transferred, concealed, disposed of or moved from the State, or would become substantially impaired in value (CPLR 7102 [c] [7]; Armored Motor Serv. v Gribbon,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.