U.S. I.N.S., U.S. BORDER PATROL v. F.L.R.A.

Nos. 92-70119, 92-70218.

12 F.3d 882 (1993)

UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent Cross-Petitioner, and National Border Patrol Council, American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1613, AFL-CIO, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided December 23, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas Ross, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for petitioner-cross-respondent.

David M. Smith, Richard Zorn, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, DC, for respondent-cross-petitioner.

Mark D. Roth, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Washington, DC, and Kevin M. Grile, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Chicago, IL, for intervenor.

Before: HUG and LEAVY, Circuit Judges and REAL, Chief District Judge.


REAL, Chief District Judge:

The UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL (INS) appeals the ruling of the FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY (FLRA) that the proposal of the NATIONAL BORDER PATROL COUNCIL, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES LOCAL 1613, AFL-CIO (UNION), which would allow Border Patrol agents to wear bullet proof vests over their uniform shirts, was subject to negotiation under 5 U.S.C. § 7106(b)(3...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases