Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that he is entitled to reversal as a result of impermissible inferential bolstering of the complainant's identification testimony by the detective who arranged the lineup at which he was identified is unpreserved for appellate review because the defendant failed to raise any objections at trial to the statements he now finds objectionable (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Moore,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.