Defendant's claim on appeal that the prosecutor's questioning of him before the grand jury was unduly argumentative and repetitive, and therefore unduly prejudicial, is unsupported by any record before this Court. Additionally, defendant concedes that the waiver of his privilege against self-incrimination and immunity was in conformity with the applicable provisions of CPL 190.45. Thus, defendant's effective waiver precluded withdrawal of that waiver during questioning by...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
