U.S. v. PASKOW

No. 92-50616.

11 F.3d 873 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stuart Jeffrey PASKOW, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submission Vacated September 13, 1993.

Resubmitted November 18, 1993.

Decided November 26, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pedro V. Castillo, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellant Stuart Jeffrey Paskow.

Warrington S. Parker III, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellee U.S.

Before: HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., REINHARDT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.


REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

The issue in this case is whether the ex post facto clause is violated when a statutory amendment that increases a penalty to be imposed upon the revocation of supervised release is applied in a case in which the underlying offense was committed before the amendment was adopted but the conduct that led to revocation of supervised release occurred afterwards. We conclude that applying the amendment under such circumstances violates the ex...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases