The record does not support the defendant's contention that the complainant's testimony was incredible, deliberately evasive and contradicted by the responding police officer's testimony and paperwork. The complainant was unequivocal in both the specifics of the robbery itself and in his in-court identification of the defendant as one of the perpetrators, the jurors thus having a sufficient basis to disregard whatever discrepancies that may have existed (People v Bleakley...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
