Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the trial court committed error by failing to charge the jury that one of the prosecution witnesses was an accomplice as a matter of law whose testimony required corroboration in order to support a conviction. Since the defendant failed to specifically request an accomplice instruction or to object to the trial court's charge as given, this contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.