Defendant's claim that the testimony of a police officer regarding the radio transmissions he received and the actions that he and his team followed was improperly admitted into evidence is unpreserved for review (CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review, we would find it to be meritless since the testimony was necessary to explain to the jury the events which resulted in defendant's arrest (see, People v Sarmiento...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
