Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant claims that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel when the hearing court permitted the defendant's attorney to represent both the defendant and one of his codefendants, whose own attorney was scheduled to appear elsewhere, at the Wade hearing. Although the hearing court failed to conduct an inquiry to determine whether the defendant's decision to pursue joint representation at the Wade...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.