ROA v. F.W. WOOLWORTH CO.


189 A.D.2d 689 (1993)

Vianca Roa, Respondent, v. F.W. Woolworth Co. et al., Defendants, and KBI Security Service, Inc., Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 19, 1993


While it is within a court's discretion to impose sanctions for conduct which "frustrates the disclosure scheme provided by the CPLR" (Zletz v Wetanson, 67 N.Y.2d 711, 713), the sanction imposed is greater than is required to vindicate the statutory scheme. Defendant-appellant's actions in giving the name and address only of the person plaintiff alleged to have assaulted and improperly detained her while denying his involvement was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases