1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 191 A.D.2d
  5. 191 A.D.2d 685 (1993)
 

ROTHKOPF v. ROTHKOPF

191 A.D.2d 685 (1993)

595 N.Y.S.2d 506

David Rothkopf et al., Appellants, v. Joseph M. Rothkopf et al., Defendants, and Beverly Seifert, Intervenor-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 29, 1993

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs contend that the intervenor's service of the order to show cause seeking to vacate the confessed judgment was ineffective and thus did not confer personal jurisdiction over them. Accordingly, the plaintiffs conclude, the resultant order upon their default should be vacated and the confessed judgment in their favor should be reinstated. We disagree. The subject order to show cause specified only that it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases