MATTER OF RAMUNNO


625 A.2d 248 (1993)

In the MATTER OF L. Vincent RAMUNNO, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: June 1, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L. Vincent Ramunno, Ramunno & Ramunno, Wilmington, for appellant.

Charles Slanina, Disciplinary Counsel, Wilmington, for the Board on Professional Responsibility.

Before VEASEY, C.J., HORSEY and MOORE, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Respondent L. Vincent Ramunno appeals a finding of the Board on Professional Responsibility (herein the "Board") that he violated Delaware Lawyer's Rule of Professional Conduct 3.5(c) ("Rule 3.5(c)")1 for undignified and discourteous behavior, during a court proceeding, directed to the judge and opposing counsel. The Board imposed a private admonition. Pursuant to our review under Board Rule 9(e),2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases