1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 2 F.3d
  5. 2 F.3d 85 (1993)
 

U.S. v. GROOMS

No. 92-5272.

2 F.3d 85 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norman L. GROOMS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided August 24, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven David Rosenfield, Charlottesville, VA, argued for defendant-appellant.

Donald Ray Wolthuis, Asst. U.S. Atty., Roanoke, VA, argued (E. Montgomery Tucker, U.S. Atty., Christopher W. Schinstock, Third Year Law Student, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

OPINION

HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge:

Norman Grooms was convicted of possessing crack cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. He argues on appeal that the trial court twice abused its discretion in admitting evidence on behalf of the government. Although we agree that admission of Grooms's statement of his whereabouts on the day of the charged offense...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases