BROOKS v. HAYES

No. 9218DC1262.

438 S.E.2d 420 (1993)

113 N.C. App. 168

Timmie Hill BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. Bruce Richard HAYES, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 21, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adams Kleemeier Hagan Hannah & Fouts by Clinton Eudy, Jr. and Trudy A. Ennis, Greensboro, for plaintiff appellee.

White and Crumpler by Fred G. Crumpler, Jr. and Clyde C. Randolph, Jr., Winston-Salem, for defendant appellant.


ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

At trial, plaintiff presented an expert urologist's testimony. Defendant argues that much of this testimony was erroneously allowed into evidence, especially testimony regarding the possibility of recanalization or intermittent recanalization after defendant's vasectomy.

A vasectomy is performed by removing a portion of the canal through which sperm travels, called the vas. The urologist testified that after a vasectomy, recanalization...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases