1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 425 S.E.2d
  5. 425 S.E.2d 432 (1993)
 

KELLER v. COCHRAN

No. 9129DC1070.

425 S.E.2d 432 (1993)

108 N.C. App. 786

Joseph W. KELLER, III, Plaintiff, v. Hazel A. COCHRAN and David S. White and wife Jean C. White, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 2, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Prince, Youngblood, Massagee & Jackson by Sharon B. Ellis and Roy D. Neill, Hendersonville, for plaintiff-appellant.

Ramsey, Hill, Smart, Ramsey & Pratt, P.A. by Michael K. Pratt and Angela M. Skerrett, Brevard, for defendants-appellees.

WELLS, Judge.

The sole issue of this appeal is to determine whether the trial court committed reversible error when it found plaintiff in violation of N.C.Gen.Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 11 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure and imposed a sanction. The trial court's decision to grant or deny motions to impose sanctions under Rule 11 is "reviewable de novo as a legal issue." Turner v. Duke University, 325 N.C. 152

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases