REISMAN v. COLEMAN


193 A.D.2d 659 (1993)

598 N.Y.S.2d 12

Andrew Reisman et al., Plaintiffs, v. Cole L. Coleman, Defendant. (Matter No. 1.) In the Matter of Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Appellant, v. Andrew Reisman, Respondent. (Matter No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 10, 1993


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, there are conflicting endorsements in the subject insurance policy. It is well established that an insurance policy must be construed in favor of the policyholder if reasonably susceptible to two different constructions, and any ambiguities are to be resolved in favor of the policyholder and against the carrier...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases