U.S. v. AIRLINE TARIFF PUB. CO.

Civ. A. No. 92-2854 SSH.

836 F.Supp. 9 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AIRLINE TARIFF PUBLISHING COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

November 1, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary Jean Moltenbrey, Antitrust Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for plaintiff.

Mark Leddy, Michael J. Byrnes, Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton and Jonathan B. Hill and Rachel I. Wollitzer, pro hac vice, Dow, Lohnes & Albertson, Washington, DC, for Airline Tariff Pub.

James V. Dick and Marshall Sinick, Squires, Sanders & Dempsey, Washington, DC, for Alaska Airlines.

Peter D. Isakoff, Douglas Bertrand Snyder, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, Washington, DC and Michael P. Kenny, pro hac vice, Alston & Bird, Atlanta, GA, for American Airlines.

Donald L. Flexner and Peter Bushfield Work, Crowell & Moring, Washington, DC, for Continental/Northwest.

John Louis Longstreth and James R. Weiss, Preston Gates Ellis & Rouvelas Meeds, Washington, DC, for Delta.

James Edward Anklam, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Washington, DC, and Robert H. Rawson, Jr. (pro hac vice) and Thomas Demitrack (pro hac vice), Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Cleveland, OH, for TWA.

Debra A. Valentine, O'Melveny & Meyers, Washington, DC and Henry R. Thurmann (pro hac vice), O'Melveny & Meyers, Los Angeles, CA, for United.

Charles R. Rule and Thomas Overton Barnett, Covington & Burling, Washington, DC, for USAir.

Burton J. Rubin (pro hac vice), American Soc. of Travel Agents, Inc., Alexandria, VA, for amicus curiae.


OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for a determination of whether a proposed final judgment is in the "public interest," and thus should be entered by the Court as a final judgment with respect to two of the defendants. After a thorough review of all of the materials submitted for the Court's consideration, the Court finds that the proposed final judgment is in the "public interest" as contemplated by the Antitrust...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases