STATE DIV. OF HUMAN RIGHTS v. TOKIO RE CORP.


190 A.D.2d 642 (1993)

State Division of Human Rights, on Complaint of Diana Bentkowsky, Petitioner, v. Tokio Re Corporation, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 25, 1993


The determination of the Division of Human Rights is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Consolidated Edison Co. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 77 N.Y.2d 411, 417). Petitioner did not sustain her burden of showing that the legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons articulated for her termination were pretexts for discrimination on the basis of religion (see, Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v Burdine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases