The trial court properly denied defendant's motion at the close of the People's case for a trial order of dismissal as to the burglary, since, regardless of the testimony offered by the employee from the city agency which owned the building in question, the circumstantial evidence — including the hour at which defendant and his companion were found, that they were enlarging a hole in the wall that was already large enough to see through to the adjoining premises, that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
