WALDIE v. STATE


264 N.J. Super. 558 (1993)

625 A.2d 37

STEVEN WALDIE, THE LAW OFFICES OF VENTURI, GOODWIN & BROCKWAY, P.C., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; THE NEW JERSEY STATE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; ROBERT J. DEL TUFO, ATTORNEY GENERAL; ALEXANDER P. WAUGH, JR., COUNSEL TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; JOHN M. FAHY, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL; THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION — BUREAU OF RISK MANAGEMENT; KURT P. SHADLE, ADMINISTRATOR BUREAU OF RISK MANAGEMENT; COL. JUSTIN J. DINTINO, SUPT. — NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE; RICHARD JONES, INTERNAL AFFAIRS BUREAU; STATE TROOPERS FRATERNAL ASSOCIATION; THOMAS ISKRZYCKI, PRESIDENT, STATE TROOPERS FRATERNAL ASSOCIATION; NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY; DONALD L. WATSON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. ROBERT HENIG; THE LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS J. HARTMAN, CHARTERED; AND THE LAW OFFICES OF HARTMAN, MARKS AND NUGENT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; THE NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY — OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; ROBERT J. DEL TUFO, ATTORNEY GENERAL; COL. JUSTIN J. DINTINO, SUPERINTENDENT, NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE; AND THE NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 24, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Fahy, Senior Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant State of New Jersey (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Fahy, of counsel and on the letter brief).

Patricia J. Kerins argued the cause for appellant Turnpike Authority (Sills, Cummis, Zuckerman, Radin, Tischman, Epstein & Gross, attorneys; Ms. Kerins and Paul P. Josephson, on the brief).

Richard M. Brockway argued the cause for respondent Waldie (Venturi, Goodwin & Brockway, attorneys; Jack Venturi, on the brief).

Francis J. Hartman argued the cause for respondent Henig (Hartman, Marks & Nugent, attorneys; Robin G. Marks, on the brief).

Before Judges ANTELL, DREIER and SKILLMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by ANTELL, P.J.A.D.

The State of New Jersey and its related defendants appeal, by our leave granted, from an interlocutory order of the Law Division dated November 20, 1992, denying their motion to transfer the within matter to the Appellate Division for disposition. The motion was made in the Law Division on the ground that the complaint herein sought review of State administrative agency action and could therefore only be presented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases