LYNCH v. CRUTTENDEN & CO.

Docket Nos. B065198, B066610.

18 Cal.App.4th 802 (1993)

22 Cal. Rptr.2d 636

ROBERT A. LYNCH et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CRUTTENDEN & COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

September 2, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Robertson & Falk, Gilbert R. Serota, John M. Chaisson, Keesal, Young & Logan, Dawn M. Schock and John R. Loftus for Defendants and Appellants.

Goldenring and Goldenring and Peter A. Goldenring for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

GILBERT, Acting P.J.

This consolidated appeal concerns the denial of two motions to compel arbitration made in the same case. We hold that the plaintiffs' allegations of fraud are sufficient to support the denial of the motions, and that the denial does not conflict with Prima Paint v. Flood & Conklin (1967) 388 U.S. 395 [18 L.Ed.2d 1270, 87 S.Ct. 1801].

FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases