1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 121 Wn.2d
  5. 121 Wn.2d 697 (1993)
 

VAN HOUT v. CELOTEX CORP.

No. 59306-0.

121 Wn.2d 697 (1993)

853 P.2d 908

WILLIAM VAN HOUT, Petitioner, v. CELOTEX CORPORATION, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

June 17, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwards, Sieh, Wiggins & Hathaway, by Charles K. Wiggins; Levinson, Friedman, Vhugen, Duggan & Bland, by Linda J. Dunn, Joel J. Delman, and Theodore R. Willhite, for petitioner.

Hillis Clark Martin & Peterson, P.S., by Laurie Lootens Chyz and Lynne M. Cohee, for respondent.

MADSEN, J.

We granted plaintiff's petition for review of a Court of Appeals unpublished decision. The Court of Appeals held there was sufficient evidence to go to the jury, but reversed and ordered a new trial for error in the jury instructions. Defendant cross-petitioned regarding sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm on the cross petition and reverse on plaintiff's petition, thereby reinstating the judgment rendered on the verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases