STATE v. MCVEIGH

(14399), (14400)

224 Conn. 593 (1993)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MARY MCVEIGH v. WILLIAM MCVEIGH

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released February 16, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven D. Ecker, with whom were Richard S. Cramer and, on the brief, Ira B. Grudberg and Martha Stone, for the appellants (defendant in each case).

Timothy J. Sugrue, assistant state's attorney, with whom were Steven M. Sellers, assistant state's attorney, and, on the brief, John T. Redway, state's attorney, and Bernadette Conway, assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

PETERS, C. J., CALLAHAN, BORDEN, NORCOTT and KATZ, JS.


BORDEN, J.

The dispositive issue in these consolidated appeals is whether a communication over the radio wave portion of a cordless telephone is a "[w]ire communication" as defined in General Statutes § 54-41a (1),1 which is part of our judicially supervised wiretap act (wiretap act). General Statutes §§ 54-41a through 54-41t. The defendants, Mary McVeigh and William McVeigh, appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases