1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 814 F.Supp.
  5. 814 F.Supp. 1 (1993)
 

CRUM v. U.S. PAROLE COM'N

Civ. A. No. 92-1555.

814 F.Supp. 1 (1993)

David CRUM, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 14, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Hall Crum, pro se.

Penny Marshall and Rita Pendry, Federal Public Defenders Office, Washington, DC, for petitioner.

John M. Facciola, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, DC, Kristie Stafford, Office of the Gen. Counsel, U.S. Parole Com'n, Chevy Chase, MD, for respondent U.S. Parole Com'n.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SPORKIN, District Judge.

The Petitioner, David Crum, filed the instant action pro se and in forma pauperis requesting a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petitioner, now represented by the Federal Public Defender, requests that this Court reconsider an Order entered on October 15, 1992 which granted the U.S. Parole Commission an additional enlargement of time within which to show cause why a Writ of Habeas Corpus should not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases