Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to prove that he possessed narcotics with the intent to sell it pursuant to Penal Law § 220.16 (1) is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Udzinski,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.