In this action brought pursuant to Labor Law § 740, commonly referred to as the Whistleblower Statute, it cannot be said that the IAS Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the corporate defendant, plaintiff's former employer, additional discovery with respect to whether plaintiff bears some responsibility for the acts attributed to defendant's former president, which created and presented a substantial and specific safety hazard to the public at large...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
