1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 17 Cal.App.4th
  5. 17 Cal.App.4th 791 (1993)
 

HUTCHINSON v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO

Docket No. C012961.

17 Cal.App.4th 791 (1993)

21 Cal. Rptr.2d 779

GRANT L. HUTCHINSON et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

August 2, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Sharon Siedorf Cardenas, City Attorney, William P. Carnazzo, Assistant City Attorney, and Leslie R. Lopez, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant.

Adamo & Nevarez and John B. Adamo for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

PUGLIA, P.J.

This appeal presents the question whether changed circumstances trigger a ministerial duty requiring a city to review and reevaluate a previously established speed limit on its streets. The trial court ruled there is such a ministerial duty and issued a writ of mandate directing the defendant City of Sacramento (City) to conduct engineering and traffic surveys of a segment of H Street and to consider such surveys...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases