DIXON v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP., F.A.A.

No. 92-3478.

8 F.3d 798 (1993)

David L. DIXON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 26, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald L. Kohl, Shea & Kohl, St. Charles, MO, argued, for petitioner.

Robert J. Krask, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, argued, for respondent. Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Thomas W. Petersen, Asst. Director, and Ellen M. McElligott, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, were on the brief, for respondent.

Before NEWMAN, RADER and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.


SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner David L. Dixon petitions for review of an arbitrator's award denying his grievance that he was improperly removed from his position with the Department of Transportation's ("DOT's") Federal Aviation Administration ("agency") for having altered, adulterated, or substituted a urine sample during a random drug test.1 Because we conclude that the arbitrator's award is not supported by substantial evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases