The IAS Court did not err in granting plaintiff 90 more days in which to conduct disclosure, since facts in defendant's exclusive possession might show that the meat cutter was sold in the regular course of defendant's business (see, Stiles v Batavia Atomic Horseshoes,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.