Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Under the circumstances of this case, we find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in dismissing the appellant's application to validate based on the inexcusable dilatory tactics of the appellant's counsel.
However, we note that the Supreme Court erred in its determination that the appellant did not meet the residency requirements of Election Law § 6...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
