We agree with the IAS Court that defendant is merely a commercial lender and accordingly owed no duty to the corporate plaintiff under the terms of the credit facility agreement to investigate the creditworthiness of the company which plaintiff subsidiary was about to purchase. We note in this regard that plaintiff employed outside accounting services to analyze the acquired company's financial status.
Further, we agree that a question of fact exists as to the meaning...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.