1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 498 N.W.2d
  5. 498 N.W.2d 304 (1993)
 

STEFFEY v. SOO LINE R. CO.

No. C8-92-1760.

498 N.W.2d 304 (1993)

Edwin STEFFEY, Appellant, v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied May 28, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randall J. Fuller, Gary T. LaFleur, Babcock, Locher, Neilson, & Mannella, Anoka, for appellant.

John F. Cook, CP Legal Services, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and RANDALL and PETERSON, JJ.

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

In this personal injury action, Edwin Steffey argues the trial court erred in not granting his motion for summary judgment because a federal railroad safety law created a statutory duty of care that the Soo Line owed to a trespasser such as himself and the railroad's violation of the law breached this duty. Steffey also argues the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for the railroad because material issues of fact existed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases