ARIOLA v. LONG


197 A.D.2d 605 (1993)

602 N.Y.S.2d 666

Leo Ariola, Appellant, v. Ruth S. Long, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 18, 1993


Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and a new trial is granted, with costs to abide the event.

The trial court improvidently exercised its discretion when it precluded the plaintiff's expert from testifying as to the standard of care applicable to the treatment of age related macular degeneration by laser photo-coagulation, including the informed consent to be obtained from a patient before such treatment is administered. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases